Where hardness becomes a liability
The Cavendish automotive lightweighting programme showed that thin-wall structural parts can be moulded down to 0.3 mm wall thickness, and that the biggest single constraint on the tool is not wear — it is toughness. The tool is subjected to very high clamp pressure, fast fill velocities that send the melt slamming into the cavity walls, and thermal cycling at elevated mould temperatures. A standard hardened grade like H13 may crack from thermal fatigue at the bottom of a deep rib, or from impact at a sharp internal corner, before it shows any wear.
For thin-wall and deep-rib geometries the toughness-to-hardness ratio is what drives the choice. A steel that is too hard is brittle and cracks; a steel that is too soft yields plastically at the parting line. Toughness-oriented grades balance the two by sacrificing some wear resistance and hot strength for a much higher Charpy impact value.
The three tough-work grades
2714 (DIN 1.2714, AISI A8 modified) is a medium-alloy hot-work grade supplied in a pre-hardened condition at roughly 38–42 HRC. The vanadium addition improves toughness without the wear penalty of a pure medium-alloy grade. It machines quickly, polishes well and is the default for a thin-wall bridge or production tool that does not need the highest hardness.
2767 (DIN 1.2767, AISI H43) is similar composition but supplied at a higher hardness (44–46 HRC) with correspondingly lower toughness than 2714. It is chosen where the thin-wall tool also runs a slightly higher mould temperature — above roughly 120 °C — and the hardness requirement rules out 2714.
Dievar (Uddeholm proprietary) is a premium medium-alloy hot-work grade with a chromium-vanadium-molybdenum balance optimised for Charpy toughness at elevated temperature. The Charpy V-notch value at 20 °C is roughly 50–70 J compared with 20–30 J for standard H13. Dievar is the choice for the tool that cracks from thermal fatigue before it shows wear.
Why thin-wall cracks differ from other tool failures
Thin-wall cracks are not the wear cracks that show on production tools after a million shots. They are impact cracks and thermal-fatigue cracks. Impact cracks start at a sharp internal corner where the fast-moving melt hits, and propagate outward. Thermal-fatigue cracks start as a fine network on the cavity surface after repeated heating and cooling, and grow slowly from the surface inward.
Preventing both is a combination of steel selection and cavity geometry. The sharpest internal corners need a radius of at least 0.5 × wall thickness to avoid stress concentration. The gate location matters — putting the gate at the thickest section reduces the impact velocity where it matters most. And the mould temperature has to be uniform across the cavity, because thermal gradients accelerate fatigue cracking.
Clamp pressure and what it does to the tool
Thin-wall parts demand high clamp pressure because the melt pressure is concentrated at the gate and runner system, not spread over a large cavity area. The clamp pressure compresses the cavity lands on both halves, and if the lands are too narrow or the hardness is too low the tool yields plastically at the parting line. The width of the cavity land is matched to the melt pressure, and the steel grade has to be hard enough to hold that land without yielding.
The practical check: after the first high-clamp production run, inspect the cavity land under grazing light. If the land shows a polished or deformed band, the steel is too soft or the land is too narrow. Correcting either before the tool deforms permanently is cheaper than correcting it after.
Polish, welding and repair
High-toughness grades polish well. The moderate hardness means the polish schedule is straightforward — no extended diamond paste work that a harder grade would need. Welding is more demanding: the heat-affected zone is a potential crack initiation site, and the weld has to be preheated to 300–400 °C and tempered after cooling.
The honest repair rule: when a high-toughness tool cracks at a sharp corner, the crack is a signal that the corner geometry is wrong, not that the weld was bad. Correct both — weld the crack and add the radius — or the crack will come back.
Common mistakes
- Specifying a hard wear-resistant grade like DC53 on a thin-wall tool because "harder is better". The tool cracks from brittleness before it shows any wear.
- Running a high-toughness grade above its mould temperature ceiling. 2714 and 2767 soften plastically above roughly 120 °C cavity; Dievar goes higher but still not to PEEK territory.
- Welding a crack without preheat and temper. The heat-affected zone is the next crack site within a few hundred shots.
Frequently asked questions
How do I know this category is the right starting point?
Start with the failure mode. If the resin is corrosive, go to the corrosion category before volume. If the resin is abrasive, go to the wear category before polish. If the cavity has to run above 150 °C, go to high-temperature before anything else. The category you land in decides the steel family, and the grade is then chosen within that family.
Can a tool span multiple categories?
Yes — a PEEK tool with a glass-filled resin runs both the high-temperature and abrasive categories at the same time. Where categories overlap, pick the more restrictive one first. A corrosive resin with abrasive filler starts with corrosion resistance; the wear requirement is then layered on top with inserts or coating.
Why not just pick the hardest grade in this category?
Hardness buys wear resistance and indentation. It does not buy toughness, hot strength or corrosion resistance, and it costs schedule and money. The categories deliberately trade one property for another — that trade is what each is designed around.
